06.01.07
The American Herbal Products Association (AHPA), Silver Spring, MD, submitted comments to the FDA on April 27th asking that it withdraw its draft “Guidance for Industry on Complementary and Alternative Medicine Products and Their Regulation by the Food and Drug Administration.” AHPA’s comments state that FDA should “inform the public that the draft guidance has been withdrawn,” and that “no further effort should be made by FDA to develop any final guidance on this subject matter.”
According to AHPA, one of the primary reasons FDA gave for issuing this draft was to respond to what it described as “increased confusion” about products used by practitioners of complementary and alternative medicine. “But the publication of this draft has had exactly the opposite effect,” explained AHPA president Michael McGuffin, “and both the public and industry are more rather than less confused. This confusion extends to both the content of the document and to FDA’s intentions in developing it.”
AHPA’s comments also suggest that if FDA decides to go forward with a final guidance, it should provide significant clarification. AHPA suggests, for example, that FDA clearly identify which “industry” it is attempting to address, and clearly state its recognition that it “does not have jurisdiction over the practice of medicine or healing arts, including advice given by healthcare practitioners to patients with respect to products dispensed within such a practice.”
AHPA also requests that FDA “refrain from using the term ‘CAM products’ as a convenient way to refer to products that are used by practitioners of complementary and alternative medicine.” AHPA notes that its concern with this term “is that it implies that any product used by a CAM practitioner is a ‘medicine,’ and that FDA’s use of the term suggests that FDA is attempting to create both a new legal definition and agency mandate, superseding acts of Congress, in contravention of its statutory authority.”
According to AHPA, one of the primary reasons FDA gave for issuing this draft was to respond to what it described as “increased confusion” about products used by practitioners of complementary and alternative medicine. “But the publication of this draft has had exactly the opposite effect,” explained AHPA president Michael McGuffin, “and both the public and industry are more rather than less confused. This confusion extends to both the content of the document and to FDA’s intentions in developing it.”
AHPA’s comments also suggest that if FDA decides to go forward with a final guidance, it should provide significant clarification. AHPA suggests, for example, that FDA clearly identify which “industry” it is attempting to address, and clearly state its recognition that it “does not have jurisdiction over the practice of medicine or healing arts, including advice given by healthcare practitioners to patients with respect to products dispensed within such a practice.”
AHPA also requests that FDA “refrain from using the term ‘CAM products’ as a convenient way to refer to products that are used by practitioners of complementary and alternative medicine.” AHPA notes that its concern with this term “is that it implies that any product used by a CAM practitioner is a ‘medicine,’ and that FDA’s use of the term suggests that FDA is attempting to create both a new legal definition and agency mandate, superseding acts of Congress, in contravention of its statutory authority.”