01.17.12
The Electronic Retailing Self-Regulation Program (ERSP) has recommended that Emergent Health Corp., King of Prussia, PA, modify or discontinue certain Internet advertising claims for the company’s JDI MultiVitamin, which is promoted to “increase adult stem cells.” The marketer voluntarily modified several claims at issue in ERSP’s inquiry. ERSP, the electronic direct-response industry’s self-regulatory forum, is administered by the Council of Better Business Bureaus (CBBB) with policy oversight by the National Advertising Review Council (NARC). The marketer’s advertising came to the attention of ERSP pursuant to an anonymous competitive challenge.
JDI MultiVitamin is a dietary supplement containing a number of essential vitamins and minerals. According to the marketer, the supplement’s proprietary formula is also designed to “increase adult stem cells.”
At the outset of ERSP’s inquiry, the marketer asserted that it had voluntarily modified or discontinued certain of the claims at issue. While confirming that Emergent Health had implemented changes, ERSP noted in it decision that it remained concerned with several core claims. ERSP further noted that the advertiser did not provide ERSP with the results of testing on the JDI MultiVitamin formula, but instead relied on studies of the product’s ingredients.
Following its review, ERSP determined that the evidence in the record did not support claims that the use of the product would increase the number of adult stem cells, thereby improving immune system support, decreasing inflammation or bettering mental acuity and mood. ERSP recommended Emergent Health discontinue claims that the product can increase the number stem cells and/or provide specific disease protection.
ERSP was also concerned about statements that could be reasonably interpreted as unqualified superiority claims (e.g., “The most simple and cost effective…” and “the most advanced…”). Emergent Health informed ERSP that it has modified these claims to appear in future advertising in a non-comparative context.
Regarding the consumer testimonials at issue, ERSP noted that consumer endorsements themselves are not competent and reliable scientific evidence and a marketer should possess reliable substantiation—including, when appropriate, competent and reliable scientific evidence—to support such in the same manner the marketer would be required to do if it had made the representation directly. In the absence of data supporting the results consumers can typically expect, ERSP recommended that the marketer refrain from using consumer testimonials to communicate atypical product performance.
JDI MultiVitamin is a dietary supplement containing a number of essential vitamins and minerals. According to the marketer, the supplement’s proprietary formula is also designed to “increase adult stem cells.”
At the outset of ERSP’s inquiry, the marketer asserted that it had voluntarily modified or discontinued certain of the claims at issue. While confirming that Emergent Health had implemented changes, ERSP noted in it decision that it remained concerned with several core claims. ERSP further noted that the advertiser did not provide ERSP with the results of testing on the JDI MultiVitamin formula, but instead relied on studies of the product’s ingredients.
Following its review, ERSP determined that the evidence in the record did not support claims that the use of the product would increase the number of adult stem cells, thereby improving immune system support, decreasing inflammation or bettering mental acuity and mood. ERSP recommended Emergent Health discontinue claims that the product can increase the number stem cells and/or provide specific disease protection.
ERSP was also concerned about statements that could be reasonably interpreted as unqualified superiority claims (e.g., “The most simple and cost effective…” and “the most advanced…”). Emergent Health informed ERSP that it has modified these claims to appear in future advertising in a non-comparative context.
Regarding the consumer testimonials at issue, ERSP noted that consumer endorsements themselves are not competent and reliable scientific evidence and a marketer should possess reliable substantiation—including, when appropriate, competent and reliable scientific evidence—to support such in the same manner the marketer would be required to do if it had made the representation directly. In the absence of data supporting the results consumers can typically expect, ERSP recommended that the marketer refrain from using consumer testimonials to communicate atypical product performance.